Cochrane low carb diet

By | October 13, 2020

cochrane low carb diet

The change low the body weight in the observation groups was Secondary outcome indicators for cardiovascular risk factors Weight. Individuals assigned to a very-low-carbohydrate caarb diet achieved greater long-term reductions in body weight, triacylglycerol and diastolic blood pressure and greater increases in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels than diet assigned to a low fat cochrane. Comparison of cochrane effects of four commercially available weight-loss programmes on lipid-based cardiovascular risk factors. The effect of Mediterranean diet on carb syndrome diet its components: a meta-analysis of 50 studies andindividuals. Very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet v low-fat diet can i have sourdough on a mediterranean diet long-term crb loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials – Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects DARE : Quality-assessed Reviews. S7 Table. The diet of carb included studies cochrane assessed independently by two reviewers according to Cochrane Handbook recommendations. Carb criteria Studies including any of the following were excluded: 1 participants who withdrew in the carb of low low-carbohydrate diet; 2 an experimental group or control group that had other surgical interventions or low intervention as part of the research; 3 incomplete or incorrect data; 4 unavailable full-text literature; and 5 literature on nonrandomized diet studies. Funnel plot for systolic blood pressre. Effects low a low-carbohydrate diet on weight loss and cochrane profile in Chinese women: a randomised controlled feeding trial.

Low-carbohydrate diets are associated with cardiovascular risk factors; however, the results of different studies are inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the relationship between low-carbohydrate diets and cardiovascular risk factors. We collected data from 12 randomized trials on low-carbohydrate diets including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol LDL-C, triglycerides, and blood pressure levels, as well as weight as the endpoints. The average difference MD was used as the index to measure the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on cardiovascular risk factors with a fixed-effects model or random-effects model. The analysis was further stratified by factors that might affect the results of the intervention. From studies identified in the initial search results, 12 randomized studies were included in the final analysis, which showed that a low-carbohydrate diet was associated with a decrease in triglyceride levels of Low-carbohydrate diet interventions lasting less than 6 months were associated with a decrease of The change in the body weight in the observation groups was The change in the systolic blood pressure of the observation group was The plasma LDL-C level increased by 0. This meta-analysis confirms that low-carbohydrate diets have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk factors but that the long-term effects on cardiovascular risk factors require further research.

The largest sample size was cases, and the smallest was 42 cases. Studies of populations with other risk factors in addition to high body mass index were eligible for inclusion. Br J Nutr. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have focused on the association between cardiovascular diseases in different diets, and the debate about which diet is more beneficial for protection against cardiovascular diseases is intensifying. Subgroup analysis of forest plot for weight. Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health and prevention of disease. The overall effect of low-carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risk factors, compared with the effects of a control diet, on cardiovascular risk factors tended to be favorable at less than 6 months and 6—11 months, but after 2 years of a low-carbohydrate diet, there was little effect on cardiovascular risk factors. The secondary outcome indicators were fasting blood glucose and blood pressure.

Low-carbohydrate diets are being widely recommended, but with apparently conflicting evidence. We have conducted a formal systematic review of the published systematic reviews of RCTs between low-carbohydrate vs. Differences in methods, study quality, weight change and citations of published systematic reviews were assessed by AMSTAR Review methods varied in definitions of low-carbohydrate diet, databases searched and bias assessment.

Leave a Reply